Coffey v. Hancock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert reconstruction testimony may supplement lay witness testimony “where knowledge and application of principles of physics and chemistry are necessary to the jurors’ proper interpretation of a vehicle’s speed”
• our court “is not a depository in which an appellant may dump its arguments without factual foundation in hopes that we will sift through the entire record to find support for a determination favorable to appellant’s position”
• our court \is not a depository in which an appellant may dump its arguments without factual foundation in hopes that we will sift through the entire record to find support for a determination favorable to appellant's position\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).