· 7/9/2010
Coffey v. BOARD OF GEOLOGIST EXAMINERS
Citations
- 235 P.3d 678
- 348 Or. 494
- 2010 Ore. LEXIS 506
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining when property used in a business will be an “integral part” of the regular business operations
- referring to OAR 809-020-0001 to 809-020-0030 as describing several goals for professional geologists, e.g., honesty, integrity, and protection of the public health and welfare
- describing criteria for determining whether an agency must enact rules before selecting a disciplinary sanction
- where the board's factual findings are not challenged, those findings are the facts for purposes of judicial review
- where the factual findings of the board are not challenged, those findings are the facts for the purposes of judicial review
- “[W]e cannot attribute to the legislature an intent to require the board to specify by rule, in advance of adjudica- tion, how it will determine the community standard of care in every case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.