Skip to main content
· 7/9/2010

Coffey v. BOARD OF GEOLOGIST EXAMINERS

Citations

  • 235 P.3d 678
  • 348 Or. 494
  • 2010 Ore. LEXIS 506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining when property used in a business will be an “integral part” of the regular business operations
  • referring to OAR 809-020-0001 to 809-020-0030 as describing several goals for professional geologists, e.g., honesty, integrity, and protection of the public health and welfare
  • describing criteria for determining whether an agency must enact rules before selecting a disciplinary sanction
  • where the board's factual findings are not challenged, those findings are the facts for purposes of judicial review
  • where the factual findings of the board are not challenged, those findings are the facts for the purposes of judicial review
  • “[W]e cannot attribute to the legislature an intent to require the board to specify by rule, in advance of adjudica- tion, how it will determine the community standard of care in every case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.