Skip to main content
· 7/20/2000

Coffer v. Arndt

Citations

  • 732 N.E.2d 815
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 1082
  • 2000 WL 994298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where claimant discovered malpractice twenty-two months prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations, he was required to file within that time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brook, Darden, Mattingly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.