Coffee v. Gates & Bro.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that when evaluating an offeror’s past performance, “FAR 15.305(a)(2) affords agencies considerable discretion in deciding what data is most relevant”
• finding that when evaluating an offeror’s past performance, “FAR 15.305(a)(2) affords agencies considerable discretion in deciding what data is most relevant”
• holding “that [the plaintiff] did not suffer any prejudice from the information provided in the solicitation or from the weights actually used in the evaluation of proposals”
• “The TET and the Contracting Officer reviewed all of the pricing to determine price reasonableness.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).