Coe v. Rosene

Citations

• 66 Wash. 73
• 118 P. 881
• 1911 Wash. LEXIS 1014

Syllabus

<p>Bankruptcy — Discharge—Revival by New Promise — Requisites. A letter by a bankrupt stating that be had paid some and expected to pay more of his discharged debts, specifying one that would be the next one, followed by another letter stating that he would hold the promise good but did not know when he could do what he wanted to, is not sufficient to revive the debt, under the rule that the new promise must be clear, distinct and unequivocal.</p>