Skip to main content
· 12/2/2008

Coe v. Northern Pipe Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 589 F. Supp. 2d 1055
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102387
  • 104 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1816
  • 2008 WL 5111354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • arguing that the statutory texts of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) and § 2000e-2(m) establishes that mixed and single motive claims are distinct actions, and it is the plaintiff’s prerogative to plead one or both
  • plaintiff, a truck driver, argued the Human Resources Manager was the cat's paw of the Traffic Manager

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mark W. Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.