Cody v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he corroborating evidence itself need not be sufficient to warrant conviction, but only tend to connect and identify [the] defendant with (the) crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ellison v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-02-05· cited 21×
• McNair v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-06-15· cited 17×
• Fain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-11-29· cited 13×
• Day v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-12-04· cited 11×
• King v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-07-29· cited 11×
• Dixson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-11-23· cited 11×
• Sparks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-08-18· cited 6×
• Kemp v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-02-16· cited 5×
• Tolbert v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-24· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Drake v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-06-27· cited 62×
• Drake v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-02-09· cited 44×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-03-08· cited 31×
• Burroughs v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-02-24· cited 16×
• Thurston v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-04-20· cited 10×
• Rowell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-09-18· cited 9×
• Inman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-03-18· cited 8×
• Cole v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-10-30· cited 7×