Cody v. Riecker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• garnishment of pension fund benefits under plan subject to ERISA due to arrearages in wife and child support obligations was not in conflict with anti-alienation clause of ERISA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• General Motors Corporation v. David J. Buha and James B. Stone, County District Judge
  Sixth Circuit· 1980-06-16· cited 153×
• Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-04· cited 94×
• In Re the Marriage of Branstetter
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1993-11-24· cited 22×
• M.M. v. T.M.
  New York Supreme Court· 2015-08-10· cited 2×
• Zeda v. Williams
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-01-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 837×
• American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Merry
  Second Circuit· 1979-01-29· cited 70×
• Zwingmann v. Zwingmann
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1912-04-19· cited 47×
• Cody v. Riecker
  E.D. New York· 1978-07-05· cited 42×
• Cody v. Riecker
  Second Circuit· 1979-02-23· cited 25×
• Hodson v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1935-03-08· cited 23×