North Dakota Supreme Court· 1/15/2019
Cody v. Cody
Citations
- 2019 ND 14
Syllabus
The district court has broad discretion in deciding evidentiary matters, including whether to admit telephonic testimony. Interlocutory orders generally are not appealable and may be revised or reconsidered any time before the final order or judgment is entered. Claims for ineffective assistance of counsel have not been extended to civil actions for divorce.
Judges: VandeWalle, Gerald W.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-06-17· cited 39×
- Martinson v. MartinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-06-10· cited 29×
- Spratt v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-05-18· cited 28×
- State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-11-05· cited 19×
- State v. T.L.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 19×
- Regan v. LervoldNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-04-03· cited 10×
- Riddle v. RiddleNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-02-22· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.