· 11/17/2020
Cody Harold Yates v. State
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a judgment granting relief not requested in the pleadings is void and should be vacated
- stating courts are unauthorized to grant relief not requested in the pleadings
- “Because the judgment below grants relief wholly outside the pleadings on which the default was entered, it is void and should have been vacated by the court below.”
- rescission not possible where there is no allegation that plaintiffs agreed to, or actually did, return the defendant to the status quo ante by returning proceeds of loan and benefits received therefrom to the defendant bank
- “The holder of the note may discard the mortgage entirely, and sue and recover on the note.” (quoting Taylor v. Am. Nat’l Bank of Pensacola, 63 Fla. 631, 67 So. 678, 686 (1912))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.