Skip to main content
· 5/7/2024

Cody Crittenden v. Lacey Crittenden

Citations

  • 547 P.3d 977
  • 2024 WY 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to determine whether the alleged due process violation “would have been prejudicial”
  • trial court may rely on “counsel’s assurance that the defendant has been properly informed of the nature and elements of the charge to which he is pleading guilty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.