· 2/28/2001
Codner v. Arellano
Citations
- 40 S.W.3d 666
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 1257
- 2001 WL 193746
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an implied warranty will not be imposed unless there is a demonstrated, compelling need for it and that it is not necessary to impose an implied warranty as a matter of public policy if plaintiff has other adequate remedies to redress the alleged wrongs committed by defendants
- stating that an implied warranty will not be imposed unless there is a demonstrated, compelling need for it and that it is not necessary to impose an implied warranty as a matter of public policy if plaintiff has other adequate remedies to redress the alleged wrongs committed by defendants
- stating that an implied warranty will not be imposed unless there is a demonstrated, compelling need for it and that it is not necessary to impose an implied warranty as a matter of public policy if plaintiff has other adequate remedies to redress the alleged wrongs committed by defendants
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yeakel, Patterson, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.