Skip to main content
· 12/23/1996

Codest Engineering v. Hyatt International Corp.

Citations

  • 954 F. Supp. 1224
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19204
  • 1996 WL 745120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that failure to state a claim may properly be asserted as an affirmative defense
  • striking failure to state a claim defense that did not refer to any particular count of complaint and did not notify plaintiff of any specific infirmities in complaint
  • Striking the same affirmative defense for failing to identify any specific infirmities in the complaint
  • striking the failure-to-state-a-claim defense for failing to identify any specific infirmities in the complaint
  • granting in part and denying in part a motion to strike affirmative defenses, but permitting defendant to replead with the reminder that “its pleading of affirmative defenses is subject to Rule 11”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.