Codapro Corp. v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “most courts have required some form of unambiguous written evidence of consent to the court”
• “The Court is not convinced that the letters from various individual defendant annexed as supporting exhibits . . . constitute a valid written consent to removal” because “they were not communicated directly to the Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).