Coconut Key Homeowners Ass'n v. Lexington Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in addition to the plaintiff’s motion not being supported by legal authority, the motion could have been “denied because [the] [p]laintiff failed to comply with Local Rule 7.1(A)(3
• finding an expert unqualified to testify as to the wind speeds during Hurricane Wilma or the cause of the damages to the condominiums at issue in the case where he specialized in window replacement and had no background in engineering or in pressure damage
• expert’s methodology in forming an opinion concerning the cause of roof damage was not reliable where expert did not know wind speed in the area during the storm in question, had not ruled out alternative causes of roof damage, and had no background in engineering

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).