Cockroft v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an erroneous ruling under Rule 403 is subject to harmless error review
• noting that “[e]vidence of criminal activity other than the charged offense is admissible for purposes of Rule 404(b
• explaining that a “search is federal in execution if a federal official had a hand in it” and concluding that Rule 41 did apply in that case because federal agents provided intelligence information to the state officers involved
• allowing introduc- tion of evidence of uncharged drug and money-laundering activity to obtain a conspiracy conviction of defendant who was extra- dited
• applying the “reason- ably well trained officer” test to a violation of Rule 41
• magistrate failed to make record of officers’ affirmations in violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(d)(2)©

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).