Cockrell v. Estevez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where defendant claimed neither lack of service nor that he was misled by misspelled name, record did not reflect invalid sendee
• although defendant’s name was misspelled in citation and return, default judgment not void where defendant did not claim lack of service and was clearly not misled by spelling error
• where defendant claimed neither lack of service nor that he was misled by misspelled name, record did not reflect invalid service
• although defendant's name was misspelled in citation and return, default judgment not void where defendant did not claim lack of service and was clearly not misled by spelling error
• although defendant’s name was misspelled in citation and return, default judgment not void where defendant did not claim lack of service and was clearly not misled by spelling error
• appellant claimed only that the improper spelling of his name voided the citation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).