Cocking v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a man 24 was “upon” a vehicle when he was placing chains on a vehicle’s tires because he was “in 25 the requisite physical relationship to the car” and was “using” the car
• plaintiffs found to be “upon” an automobile while standing several feet behind it with tire chains
• driver of vehicle standing on side of the road to put snow chains on the tires was insured when struck by uninsured motorist
• man was insured when he was 20 injured while preparing to place car chains on the vehicle
• coverage was allowed when individual was injured while putting chains on an uninsured automobile
• coverage was allowed when individual was injured while putting chains on an uninsured automobile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).