Cockburn v. Union Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no higher sentence than that which would have been imposed by the trial forum may be affirmed
• holding no higher sentence than that which would have been imposed by the trial forum may be affirmed
• holding no higher sentence than that which would have been imposed by the trial forum may be affirmed
• holding no higher sentence than that which would have been imposed by the trial forum may be affirmed
• sentence reassessment involves ensuring “the sentence is no greater than that which would have been imposed if the prejudicial error had not been committed”
• sentence reassessment reviewed for abuse of discretion or obvious miscarriage of justice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).