Cockburn v. Howard Johnson, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]n Tennessee, a suit is subject to a plea in abatement 9 where there is pending another suit on the same subject.”
• stating that “[i]n Tennessee, a suit is subject to a plea in abatement 9 where there is pending another suit on the same subject.”
• “The defendants in these two cases are not identical but are in effect the same”
• “The defendants in these two cases are not identical but are in effect the same”
• where the Court found that the pri- or suit pending analysis applied, even though the defendants in the two cases were not identical, they were in effect the same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).