Cochrane v. Swartout

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Lashley, et al., on the grounds that “[i]n each of those cases the testimony of those whose testimony was not recorded not only participated in the reconstruction but re-testified”
• “Stipulation of Lost Testimony” as an attempt to reconstruct witness testimony was insufficient to satisfy verbatim transcript when completed without the assistance of the witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).