Cochran v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming defendant’s convictions for theft by conversion based upon evidence that the defendants legally obtained money from the victim to be used to purchase property for the victim but, instead, used the money to purchase property for themselves
• defendant could be found guilty of theft by conversion on a party-to-the-crime theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kohlhaas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-08· cited 15×
• Matthiessen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-11-21· cited 9×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Feagin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-02-01· cited 16×
• Hight v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-05-24· cited 16×
• Bartel v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-01-08· cited 10×
• Tchorz v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-10-05· cited 8×
• Mason v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-09-09· cited 8×
• In the Interest of J. S. S.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-10-06· cited 3×