Cochran v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statute extends proscription of double jeopardy beyond constitutional limits
• “For purposes of . . . OCGA § 16-1-8, a defendant has been 9 Some of the confusion is likely spawned from our use of the term “procedural double jeopardy” when referring to OCGA § 16-1-8 (b) (in conjunction with OCGA § 16-1-7 (b)). See generally Pruiett, 324 Ga. App. at 794 (1) (b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Teal v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-03-04· cited 21×
• Sewell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-10-27· cited 21×
• Hubbard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-02-10· cited 18×
• Garrett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-10-13· cited 16×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-01-26· cited 13×
• Waters v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-12-03· cited 11×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-01-11· cited 10×
• State v. Daniels
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-11-10· cited 6×
• Herrington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-03-23· cited 3×
• State v. Samuel Carlton Adams
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-07-13

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Patterson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-02-04· cited 155×
• McCannon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-05-01· cited 65×
• Curry v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-09-09· cited 47×
• State v. McCrary
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-01-30· cited 31×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-01-29· cited 8×
• Caldwell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-07-16· cited 3×