Cochran v. Shull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “when Congress has provided a mechanism capable of rectifying mistaken actions ... it is not reasonable to infer authority to reconsider agency action” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• removing certain electric utility steam generating units from a list of sources regulated by the Clean Air Act
• noting Congress’s “concern[] about the slow pace” of EPA’s regulation of hazardous air pollutants
• “[I]t is reasonable for the permitting authority — under these unique and compelling circumstances, and within the bounds of its discretion under ... Section 112(g
• “Congress . . . undoubtedly can limit an agency’s discretion to reverse itself”
• “[P]revious statutory violations cannot excuse the one now before the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).