Cochran v. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of ill will creates jury question on actual malice where \[t]here are no facts or statements of record which even remotely support\ the defamatory implication at issue
• holding that evidence of ill will creates jury question on actual malice where “[t]here are no facts or statements of record which even remotely support” the defamatory implication at issue
• desire to \get\ plaintiff is \relevant and admissible as evidence in the determination of whether defendant possessed a state of mind highly conducive to reckless disregard of falsity\
• desire to \get\ plaintiff is \relevant and admissible as evidence in the determination of whether defendant possessed a state of mind highly conducive to reckless disregard of falsity\
• desire to “get” plaintiff is “relevant and admissible as evidence in the determination of whether defendant possessed a state of mind highly conducive to reckless disregard of falsity”
• “[t]he place and position of an item in a publication is to be considered” in determining whether an article implied a defamatory message

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).