· 2/1/1892
Cochran v. Harvey
Citations
- 88 Ga. 352
- 14 S.E. 580
- 1892 Ga. LEXIS 29
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding recovery for services in quantum meruit precluded where “an enforceable oral contract exist[ed] that covered the matter of plaintiff's compensation”
- “[G]iven that an enforceable oral contract exists, covering the matter of plaintiff’s compensation, recovery for those services in quantum meruit is precluded.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bleckley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.