Skip to main content
· 2/1/1892

Cochran v. Harvey

Citations

  • 88 Ga. 352
  • 14 S.E. 580
  • 1892 Ga. LEXIS 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding recovery for services in quantum meruit precluded where “an enforceable oral contract exist[ed] that covered the matter of plaintiff's compensation”
  • “[G]iven that an enforceable oral contract exists, covering the matter of plaintiff’s compensation, recovery for those services in quantum meruit is precluded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bleckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.