Skip to main content
· 9/8/1981

Cochran v. Connell

Citations

  • 632 P.2d 1385
  • 53 Or. App. 933
  • 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • offeror may restrict the manner of acceptance, provided the intention to do so is clearly expressed
  • offeror may restrict manner of acceptance if his intention to do so is clearly expressed
  • in an appeal from summary judgment that resulted from cross-motions for summary judgment, if both the granting of one motion and the denial of the other are assigned as error, then both are subject to review
  • when a party appeals the grant of one motion for summary judgment and the denial of a cross-motion for summary judgment, both are subject to review for errors of law if there are no genuine issues as to any material facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette, Roberts, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.