· 9/8/1981
Cochran v. Connell
Citations
- 632 P.2d 1385
- 53 Or. App. 933
- 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- offeror may restrict the manner of acceptance, provided the intention to do so is clearly expressed
- offeror may restrict manner of acceptance if his intention to do so is clearly expressed
- in an appeal from summary judgment that resulted from cross-motions for summary judgment, if both the granting of one motion and the denial of the other are assigned as error, then both are subject to review
- when a party appeals the grant of one motion for summary judgment and the denial of a cross-motion for summary judgment, both are subject to review for errors of law if there are no genuine issues as to any material facts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillette, Roberts, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.