Cochran v. Cochran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding: “It is well settled that a trial court, who has made a finding that a party is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, may properly impute income to that party based upon that party’s demonstrated earning capacity”
• reversing the attorney’s fees award because the distribution left the parties “on roughly equal financial footing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Freilich v. Freilich
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-04· cited 24×
• Rufus Hutchinson v. Hattie P. Hutchinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-20· cited 4×
• Alvarez-Reyes v. Fernandez-Gil
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Warner v. Warner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-25· cited 42×
• Schiller v. Schiller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-10-05· cited 13×
• Golden v. Golden
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-02-09· cited 12×
• Cortina v. Cortina
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-11-13· cited 8×
• Arouza v. Arouza
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-06· cited 8×