Cochran v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Abbott v. Administrative Hearing Bd., supra, and citing Elliott v. Kupferman, 58 Md.App. 510, 473 A.2d 960 (1984)
• purpose of § 734 is to enforce an accused officer’s rights, not to “restrict agency’s legitimate right to discipline errant officers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).