Cochenour v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “plaintiff seeking to hold an employer liable for 24 injuries caused by employees acting within the scope of their employment is not required 25 to name or join the employees as defendants”
• common design established by evidence defendant committed \markedly similar acts of misconduct against similar victims under similar circumstances.\
• “The courthouse doors are open for people who experience slight physical 26 injury — yet closed to others who suffer devastating purely economic losses.”
• “[T]he primary focus in determining the existence of mutual consent is upon 8 the acts of the parties involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).