Cocconi v. Pierre Hotel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it was not improper for a corporate travel consultant to share knowledge regarding the reputation of hotels during deliberations
• “Courts are ordinarily reluctant . . . to probe a jury’s deliberative process to examine the basis for a jury’s verdict.”
• “Extraneous information is nonprejudicial if it is cumulative of properly admitted evidence.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).