Skip to main content
· 4/12/1978

Cocco v. Maryland Commission on Medical Discipline

Citations

  • 384 A.2d 766
  • 39 Md. App. 170
  • 1978 Md. App. LEXIS 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Actions before professional disciplinary boards are neither criminal nor civil and thus are not subject to the same protections as pure criminal prosecutions.
  • “[Disciplinary proceedings against a professional have the unique purpose of protecting the public from the results of a professional’s improper conduct, incompetence or unscrupulous practices.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morton, Davidson, Melvin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.