Skip to main content
· 4/1/1975

Coca Cola Company v. Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 533 P.2d 788
  • 271 Or. 517
  • 1975 Ore. LEXIS 534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “contractual agreement” between parent and subsidiary concerning subsidiary’s use of soft drink syrups in substantial competition with parent’s
  • “The combined method of apportionment reporting is wholly consistent with, and a natural extension of, the apportionment method.”
  • “The combined method of apportionment reporting is wholly consistent with, and a natural extension of, the apportionment method.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Bryson, Sloper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.