Coby Minton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that competitive neutrality does not prohibit a regulator “from according different treatment to competitors whose circumstances are materially distinct”
• finding that the burden to explain is relaxed when the Commission left existing levels in place for an interim period
• discussing deference to a rate that did not reach the Commission’s ultimate goal of universal broadband access

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).