Coburn v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under the likelihood-of-success requirement, the movant must demonstrate not only that “this Court erred in its decisions, but also that the Second Circuit is likely to grant mandamus”
• In the context of a motion to stay proceedings pending mandamus review, there was no irreparable harm where party delayed 2-months before filing motion
• “‘[I]nexcusable delay in filing’ a motion to stay ‘severely undermines the . . . argument that absent a stay irreparable harm would result.’”
• “[T]he irreparability is a product of [their] own delay. This is a delaying tactic that is inequitable to the [Plaintiffs] and to the courts as well.” (quoting Hirschfeld v. Bd. of Elections in N.Y.C., 984 F.2d. 35, 39 (2d Cir. 1993)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).