District of Columbia· 4/28/2003
Cobell v. Norton
Citations
- 260 F. Supp. 2d 110
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6984
- 2003 WL 1960016
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- asserting that Interior could not answer the question “Whether, at any time, the GAO has conducted a final comprehensive audit of individual Indian trust accounts” because plaintiffs had not defined the term “final comprehensive audit”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.D.C. Circuit· 2001-02-23· cited 265×
- Engelsmann v. HolekampSupreme Court of Missouri· 1966-05-09· cited 35×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2002-09-17· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.