District of Columbia· 9/30/2002
Cobell v. Norton
Citations
- 223 F. Supp. 2d 156
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18178
- 2002 WL 31159451
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendants request adjustment or reconsideration of Kieffer’s compensation because he “failed to provide sufficiently detailed information about the work performed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.D.C. Circuit· 2001-02-23· cited 265×
- Fletcher Casey, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 1994-12-27· cited 43×
- Texas v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 1986-02-24· cited 6×
- Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Agency for International DevelopmentSupreme Court· 1990-10-29· cited 2×
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1990-10-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.