Cobb v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming an injunction that prohibited the Secretary of State from placing on the ballot a referendum which, if enacted, would leave “an obvious defect in the constitution”
• affirming an injunction that prohibited the Secretary of State from placing on the ballot a referendum which, if enacted, would leave \an obvious defect in the constitution\
• affirming an injunction that prohibited the Secretary of State from placing on the ballot a referendum which, if enacted, would leave “an obvious defect in the constitution”
• “judicial intervention . . . is not encouraged”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCH
  Montana Supreme Court· 2012-05-18· cited 90×
• Montanans Opposed to I-166 v. State
  Montana Supreme Court· 2012-08-10· cited 15×
• MEA-MFT v. McCulloch
  Montana Supreme Court· 2012-09-25· cited 10×
• McDonald v. Jacobsen
  Montana Supreme Court· 2022-08-12· cited 5×
• MEA-MFT v. Fox (LR 127)
  Montana Supreme Court· 2014-03-25· cited 2×
• Cottonwood v. State
  Montana Supreme Court· 2024-12-18· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Harper v. Waltermire
  Montana Supreme Court· 1984-11-28· cited 38×
• State Ex Rel. Montana Citizens for the Preservation of Citizens' Rights v. Waltermire
  Montana Supreme Court· 1986-12-11· cited 23×
• State Ex Rel. Montana School Boards Ass'n v. Waltermire
  Montana Supreme Court· 1986-12-11· cited 20×
• State Ex Rel. Boese v. Waltermire
  Montana Supreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 18×