Cobb v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Testimony to exclude a confession will not suffice if it is contradicted by competent evidence that the statements were, in fact, made.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holloway v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2000-09-28· cited 30×
• Sneed v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2009-08-25· cited 20×
• Dees v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2000-05-09· cited 10×
• McBride v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-07-25· cited 9×
• Gray v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-01-17· cited 8×
• Anthony Davon Jefferson v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2016-11-01· cited 6×
• Bruce v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2010-06-01· cited 3×
• Carlisle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2002-03-19· cited 3×
• Randolph v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-03-21· cited 2×
• Wright v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2004-01-06· cited 1×
• Rickey O'Neal Holloway v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1999-07-01
• Johnny Vondelle Ford a/k/a Johnny Ford v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2022-02-15

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Groseclose v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1983-10-12· cited 463×
• Duplantis v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 296×
• Gossett v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1995-08-17· cited 182×
• Reynolds v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1991-09-04· cited 133×
• Malone v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 112×
• Gayten v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1992-02-19· cited 69×
• Scott v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 39×
• Shoemaker v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1987-02-18· cited 32×
• White v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1989-03-29· cited 18×