· 8/15/2005
Cobb v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
Citations
- 618 S.E.2d 299
- 365 S.C. 360
- 2005 S.C. LEXIS 241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the Act is applicable to the inverse condemnation right to a jury trial \[i]n light of the historical treatment of an inverse condemnation action as equivalent to an eminent domain case\
- explaining that in an inverse condemnation case, the trial court will first determine whether a claim has been established, and then, the issue of compensation may be submitted to a jury at either party’s request
- noting section 28-2-310 \provides in an eminent domain action a property owner or the condemnor may elect a jury trial on the issue of compensation\
- “If an order deprives a party of a mode of trial to which that party is entitled as a matter of right, the order is immediately appealable and failure to do so forever bars appellate review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.