Cobb v. Nizami

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defenses of lack of guilt and entrapment permitted as not inconsistent where the defendant contended that he was an agent rather than principal, but that whatever role he played was a result of entrapment
• defenses of lack of guilt and entrapment permitted as not inconsistent where the defendant contended that he was an agent rather than principal, but that whatever role he played was a result of entrapment
• The continuing validity of the \concurrent sentence\ doctrine was upheld
• The continuing validity of the “concurrent sentence” doctrine was upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).