Skip to main content
· 10/6/1903

Cobb v. Michigan Cent. R. Co.

Citations

  • 127 F. 1018
  • 61 C.C.A. 678
  • 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • crediting plaintiff’s argument that “a defendant who 17 builds a business based upon a clear violation of the trade secrets and employment 18 agreements of the plaintiff cannot defeat a preliminary injunction by claiming the business 19 will be harmed . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.