Cobb v. City of Roswell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Claims Court lacks jurisdiction to order the government to refund IRS penalties where the plaintiff has not filed a refund claim with the IRS
• explaining that the Claims Court lacks jurisdiction to order the government to refund IRS penalties where the plaintiff has not filed a refund claim with the IRS
• affirming dismissal for lack of 8 subject-matter jurisdiction where the plaintiff sought compensatory damages because the Tucker Act precludes claims for “tort damages”
• affirming dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction where the plaintiff sought compensatory damages, because the Tucker Act precludes claims for “tort damages”
• “The Court of Federal Claims also cannot adjudicate Mr. Rogers’ claim for restitution for mental anguish and punitive damages because the Tucker Act limits the court’s jurisdiction to ‘cases not sounding in tort.’”
• affirming dismissal of claim seeking legal fees as compensatory damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).