· 12/31/2015
COBB, ROOSEVELT v. SHEAHAN, MICHAEL
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying equitable mootness when “allowing an appeal to go forward will impinge upon actions taken to one’s detriment in good faith reliance on a final and unstayed judgment”
- applying the mootness doctrine despite the presence of state constitutional claims
- appeal was equitably moot because “the County and others ha[d] taken significant and largely irreversible steps in reliance on the unstayed plan confirmed by the bankruptcy court”
- “The facts will weigh in favor of finding equitable mootness when allowing an appeal to go forward will impinge upon actions taken to one’s detriment in good faith reliance on a final and unstayed judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.