· 11/20/1978
Coast Trading Co. v. Parmac, Inc.
Citations
- 587 P.2d 1071
- 21 Wash. App. 896
- 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1047
- 1978 Wash. App. LEXIS 2730
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, under an unjust enrichment theory, a portion of money that had been paid to another was not unjustly retained
- damages restricted to amount in liquidated damages clause in sales contract although actual damages substantially in excess of that sum
- damages restricted to amount in liquidated damages clause in sales contract although actual damages substantially in excess of that sum
- “The count for ‘money had and received’ is an ancient common-law remedy with equitable overtones; it is based upon quasi contract or contract implied in law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.