Skip to main content
· 11/20/1978

Coast Trading Co. v. Parmac, Inc.

Citations

  • 587 P.2d 1071
  • 21 Wash. App. 896
  • 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1047
  • 1978 Wash. App. LEXIS 2730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under an unjust enrichment theory, a portion of money that had been paid to another was not unjustly retained
  • damages restricted to amount in liquidated damages clause in sales contract although actual damages substantially in excess of that sum
  • damages restricted to amount in liquidated damages clause in sales contract although actual damages substantially in excess of that sum
  • “The count for ‘money had and received’ is an ancient common-law remedy with equitable overtones; it is based upon quasi contract or contract implied in law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.