Skip to main content
· 4/3/2020

Coast Community College Dist. v. Com. on State Mandates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • question of double damages should have been submitted to jury where, during the pendency of the lengthy litigation, the employer could have and should have known that additional compensation was owed to employee
  • claim for special damages that was argued and ruled on in trial court treated as if it had been pleaded even though claim was not included in original pleadings; decision based on CR 54 rather than CR 15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.