Coalition for the Advancement of Regional Transportation v. Federal Highway Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding petition based on oral argument, briefing, and affidavits from both parties
• declining to defer to dictum in Supreme Court opinion that petitioner was not guilty of offense other than offense of conviction
• deciding petition based on oral ar- gument, briefing, and affidavits from both parties
• deciding petition based on oral ar- gument, briefing, and affidavits from both parties
• “It would therefore seem that the revision was for the purpose of clarity, and that no substantial change in the substantive law was in- tended.”
• “It would therefore seem that the revision was for the purpose of clarity, and that no substantial change in the substantive law was in- tended.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).