Coalition for an Airline Passengers' Bill of Rights v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “hacking into a person’s private computer and stealing personal correspondence would represent an intentional intrusion on the victim’s private affairs ... highly offensive to a reasonable person”
• denying motion for judgment on the pleadings where the plaintiff alleged the defendant hacked into a private computer, stole personal correspondences, spreadsheets, lists of donors, and research, and left computer “corrupted” and “useless”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).