· 10/2/2008
C.O. v. Doe
Citations
- 757 N.W.2d 343
- 2008 Minn. LEXIS 539
- 2008 WL 4425862
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that when a statute does not specify the burden of proof as between the parties, “[t]he general rule is that the burden of proof rests on the party seeking to benefit from a statutory provision”
- stating that when a statute does not specify the burden of proof as between the parties, “[t]he general rule is that the burden of proof rests on the party seeking to benefit from a statutory provision”
- \The general rule is that the burden of proof rests on the party seeking to benefit from [the] statutory provision.\
- “[S]ummary judgment is not a means of deciding cases in which the facts are disputed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Page
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.