Skip to main content
· 6/13/1995

Cnf Constructors, Incorporated v. Donohoe Construction Company, a Division of the Donohoe Companies, Incorporated

Citations

  • 57 F.3d 395
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 29
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14530
  • 1995 WL 351884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, where a motion is for reconsideration of legal issues already addressed in an earlier ruling, the motion is not authorized by Rule 60(b)” (citation modified)
  • explaining that, “where a motion is for reconsideration of legal issues already addressed in an earlier ruling, the motion is not authorized by Rule 60(b)” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • stating that the law of the case doctrine is \discretionary and not mandatory\
  • noting that “the law of the case doctrine is discretionary and not mandatory”
  • noting that “the law of the case doctrine is discretionary and not mandatory”
  • stating that the law of the case doctrine is \discretionary and not mandatory\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Williams, Currie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.