· 6/13/1995
Cnf Constructors, Incorporated v. Donohoe Construction Company, a Division of the Donohoe Companies, Incorporated
Citations
- 57 F.3d 395
- 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 29
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14530
- 1995 WL 351884
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, where a motion is for reconsideration of legal issues already addressed in an earlier ruling, the motion is not authorized by Rule 60(b)” (citation modified)
- explaining that, “where a motion is for reconsideration of legal issues already addressed in an earlier ruling, the motion is not authorized by Rule 60(b)” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- stating that the law of the case doctrine is \discretionary and not mandatory\
- noting that “the law of the case doctrine is discretionary and not mandatory”
- noting that “the law of the case doctrine is discretionary and not mandatory”
- stating that the law of the case doctrine is \discretionary and not mandatory\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin, Williams, Currie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.